Friday, 28 May 2010

A question for you...

What did you think about the use of the Strategic Level pre-seen material? Did you need to use much information from it, in answering the Q1s?
Posted by at
Labels: ,

6 comments:

  1. Agnes28 May 2010 at 16:04

    True 10% use or less is correct.I just used one paragraph on page 4 for P3. I just hate the fact that it's next to impossible to ignore looking at the preseen b4 the exam. It's preparing me for t4, but OH the pain!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous29 May 2010 at 10:53

    I am still trying to understand what is the added benefit and value of the pre-seen material, as opposed to the old syllabus. I did the E3 exam and i only used it once during the exam.

    ReplyDelete
  3. shibu29 May 2010 at 11:40

    I am of the opinion that the questions should be set taking in to account the pre-seen material as well.In the May siting except for a few questions in sec A most of the questions were based on the un-seen

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unknown30 May 2010 at 09:48

    I did not look at it at all. I did not use it. I was however, impressed with the F3 quetion one. It had the element of or an introduction to the T4 Part B. All the sub-questions were under one single report.
    Thank you.

    Donatus Bosuh

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nana Boateng1 June 2010 at 13:29

    I did not use the pre-seen, as I reckon most of the section A questions came from the unseen material. Thanks so much David for your advice, it really helped me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Themba1 June 2010 at 13:58

    There were very little issues referring to the pre-seen material, like anyone else, I wonder want value this pre-seen is meant to achieve.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)